🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' innocence". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to enact a bill raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Charities have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are safe and fit for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping minors to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to follow the Australian lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, additional nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies strike a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate continues, the steps of this nation and others show that states around the world are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.